Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho

Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho

Supreme Court of the United States
Argued Oct. 16, 1996
Decided June 23, 1997
Full case name Idaho et al. v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho
Docket nos. 94-1474
Citations 521 U.S. 261 (more)
117 S. Ct. 2028, 138 L. Ed. 2d 438, 65 USLW 4540, 27 Envtl. L. Rep. 21,227, 97 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4776, 97 Daily Journal D.A.R. 7871, 97 CJ C.A.R. 1000, 11 Fla. L. Weekly Fed. S 90
Prior history 798 F. Supp. 1443 (D. Idaho 1992), aff'd in part, rev'd in part, 42 F.3d 1244 (9th Cir. 1994), cert. granted, 517 U.S. 1132 (1996), and cert. denied, 517 U.S. 1133 (1996)
Subsequent history On remand, 118 F.3d 1399 (9th Cir. 1997)
Holding
The Tribe's suit is not covered by the Ex parte Young exception to state immunity from suit
Court membership
Case opinions
Majority Kennedy (Parts I, II-A, and III joined by Rehnquist, O'Connor, Scalia, and Thomas; Parts II-B, II-C, and II-D joined by Rehnquist)
Concurrence O'Connor, joined by Scalia and Thomas
Dissent Souter, joined by Stevens, Ginsburg, and Breyer
Laws applied
U.S. Const. amend XI

Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261 (1997),[1] was an important U.S. Supreme Court precedent for aboriginal title in the United States and sovereign immunity in the United States. The Court held that the Coeur d'Alene Tribe could not maintain an action against the state of Idaho to press its claim to Lake Coeur d'Alene due to the state's Eleventh Amendment immunity from suit, notwithstanding the exception recognized in Ex parte Young.

After the district court's decision dismissing the suit, the federal government—in its guardian capacity—brought a substantially similar suit against Idaho; in 2001, in another 5-4 decision, the Court ruled for the federal government: Idaho v. United States (2001).[2]

Notes

  1. ^ Idaho v. Coeur d'Alene Tribe of Idaho, 521 U.S. 261 (1997).
  2. ^ Idaho v. United States, 533 U.S. 262 (2001).

References